Dear,
According to first picture, I need to download the latest version to match the version mentioned in this table.
However, from the 2nd and 3rd pictures, I don't find any file that correspond with requirement in first picture.
I've downloaded 'lib_dbsl_520-10011372.SAR', 'R3trans_610-10011367.SAR', and 'tp_612-10011367.SAR'.
I also placed them into the path the error message shows, but it still shows the same error like first picture.
Thanks
Dear All,
We are going live with our solman implementation, we have implemented ChaRM, Incident Management & Problem Management in our landscape.
We have some confusion in finalizing the tcodes that we need to have in our production environment.
Appreciate your help if you can help us in finalizing the list of t-codes that we require to manage our solman system ?
Note: There is a separate team which takes care of BASIS activities.
Thanks,
Sivakumar.C
Good Day Experts
Please can I get some assistance
I have a scenario as follows :
one Idoc Type
if in error 51 and
status msg ID = 00 and
status msg number = 348
then I want to send to a specific email
however
if an error 51 occurs for the same idoc TYPe but the
status msg ID is NOT equal to 00 and
status msg number IS NOT equal to 348
then I want the email sent to a different email address
it seems that the logic is only executing the first condition and using the email of the first condition
does anyone have any suggestions
see pics of my config
pic one
pic 2
thanks for you help
Greeting, I am looking for some assistance on why SolDocA is looking for a digital signature when creating an analysis
I am working on getting Solution Document Assistant working and have encountered an unexpected error in my Analysis log
The error reads " Error in digital signature" The error can also be seen in the Application log.
No additional information is available to continue my investigation. I have reviewed many documents and searched but have failed to find any hint to why SolDocA is looking for a digital signature and where .
The extra interesting part is we are not using digital signatures (nor are they configured)
Has anyone seen this issue and/or give guidance on where to look
In advance, thank you for your assistance
Linda Ros
Some system info:
Sol Mgr 7.1 SP13
ST-PI 2008_1_700 0011 (in Sol Mgr and managed system)
Below are the status where QA team will be involved
QA-To be Tested
QA -Tested QA
QA-Confirmed
1.When every it goes to QA for approval- it should have all the below option/status for QA and requester/message processor
Submit a document - QA
Documented submitted-Requester
Under review a document-QA
1st round Re-send for changes-QA
Changes completed-Requester-Requester
2nd round re-send for changes-QA
Approved-QA
Hold-QA
Canceled -Change document- QA
2.Reasons for Return- for example it should have a drop down with values "Need more information" or "Incomplete documents" or "Need FS" " In progress " And so on..(This need to link to above status)
Example -"Documented submitted" - than Reasons for Return - " In progress "
3.And also its required to record the time when every its changes the status
4. Email should trigger, when status is changed from Submit a document to Documented submitted
Hello forum,
I don't remember now what was my last post or answers that I did, but that forum is one of my favorites and useful to find relevant information about solution manager, one of the last changes was the left categories classification that allow us to filter the information and help to find quickly a related problem.
That week working in a project with a solman friend Raquel Pereira da Cunha we discuss about that always is need to add a few abap code in each solman projects, so the crm forums where SAP colleagues from CRM talk about CRMWEBUI is also a must read for solman consultants, SAP CRM: Webclient UI - Framework . SAP always told us that with solman out of the box you do't need any abap code, but customers are customers... 
This is my bookmark links, most used, solman SCN ans CRMWEBUI in the first position.
The next picture show more clear, about what I'm trying to explain 
What do you think ti add a categories in the left panel side to filter information about how we use our code for enhance solman functionality ?
Best Regards,
Lluis
Hi All,
we need to restrict a org unit from determination while searching for a support team using Organizational unit in ITSM ticket.
We don't want to delete this unused org unit and want to use it for future. we also loose data if we are going to delete this org unit from the structure.
Is there anyway to stop the org unit from appearing in the search for support team based on org model.
Please help me to find a way out.
Regards,
Dillip
Hello,
We are facing lot of issue with CBTA recording/execution for Purchase order Header and Item detail expansion.
We had try to cover randon behaviour of header and Item detail ( sometime need to expand and some time collapse) with the help of Default component "CBTA_GUI_A_PRESSKEY"
Here we are using URI as :" label=DYN_4000-BUTTON; type=GuiButton; id=/app/con[1]/ses[0]/wnd[0]/usr/subSUB0:SAPLMEGUI:0019/subSUB1:SAPLMEVIEWS:1100/subSUB1:SAPLMEVIEWS:4000/btnDYN_4000-BUTTON"
And KEY as : Ctrl+F2.
But we are not able to expand the Header detail tab.
Regards,
Ashish
Dear Experts,
we have made a system copy of our BW development system. The old system(s) - ABAP and Java
have been stopped. I have deactivated the Technical Monitoring for them in solman_setup.
BUT - we are still being spammed !!! The system(s) which has been shut down, produces errors in
SM21 of the Solution Manager:
Database error 1034 at CON
> con=2(<hostname>:1522/<SID>): ORA-01034: ORACLE not
> available#ORA-27101: shared memory realm does not
> exist#Solaris-AMD64 Error: 2: No such file or directory
Database error 1034
Database error 1034 at CON
And then we are getting the following e-mails:
Name....................Errors in ABAP System Log
Start Time..............02.11.2015 10:34:42 CET
End Time................02.11.2015 10:34:42 CET
Managed Object..........<MO_name>
Managed Object Type.....Technical Instance
Rating..................Red
Category................Exceptions
Status..................Open
...
PLEASE kindly advise on how to suspend these errors! Many thanks in advance!
P. S.: I don't want to entirely delete this system from Solution Manager, as I plan
to use it as a sandbox for a NetWeaver 7.4 upgrade.
Hi,
We are creating new scripts using SAP TAO on a remote server. We are able create, update and upload the Test script into ALM successfully.
However, the execution time of these scripts is very high (~5-6 times more) than normal.
SAP TAO version: 3.0.6, ALM: 12.01 and UFT is 12.02.
Best Regards,
Abhinandan
I need to be able to export documents from SOLAR01 and SOLAR02 into flat files of accessible format(not the xml / structure / transport mode). Does anyone know how we can export all documents under org units, master data,business and interface scenarios without missing even a single document via a report or any other other method please.
Regards
Kalyan
Hi guys,
After new installation of Solution Manager 7.1 I am using SUM to install all components and solution packages required is step Check Software Prerequisites in System Preperation of SAP Solution Manager Configuration.
In SUM I was able to get to phase: 5.5: Preprocessing, but now I get error:
Severe error(s) occurred in phase MAIN_SHDIMP/SUBMOD_SHD2_RUN/RUN_RSGEN!
Last error code set: No entry with key '18575400/RSGEN_GENER8_SHADOW
Full log:
1 ETQ201 Entering upgrade-phase "MAIN_SHDIMP/SUBMOD_SHD2_RUN/RUN_RSGEN" ("20151102133011")
4 ETQ399 Set database connect to shadow.
4 ETQ399 Set environment for shadow connect:
4 ETQ399 Set RFC variables for shadow connect:
4 ETQ399 System-nr = '10', GwService = 'sapgw10' Client = '000'
4 ETQ380 computing toolpath for request "TP_SHADOW_CONNECT"
4 ETQ381 request "TP_SHADOW_CONNECT" means "tp needs to connect to shadow system"
4 ETQ382 translates to group "R3UP_TOOL_GROUP_NEW"
4 ETQ399 Requirement for tp maps to 'exe'
4 ETQ383 translates to path "C:\DownloadManager\SUM\abap\exe"
4 ETQ399 Set tool parameters for shadow connect with TPPARAM 'SHADOW.TPP'.
2 ETQ366 Connect variables are set for shadow instance access
4 ETQ399 System-nr = '10', GwService = 'sapgw10' Client = '000'
4 ETQ399 Environment variables:
4 ETQ399 dbs_ora_schema=SAPSR3
4 ETQ399 auth_shadow_upgrade=1
1 ETQ200 Executing actual phase 'MAIN_SHDIMP/SUBMOD_SHD2_RUN/RUN_RSGEN'.
1 ETQ399 Phase arguments:
2 ETQ399 Arg[0] = 'RSGEN_GENER8_SHADOW'
2 ETQ399 Arg[1] = 'SAP_SGEN'
2 ETQ399 Arg[2] = ''
2 ETQ399 Arg[3] = 'RSGEN\.$(SAPSID)'
2 ETQ399 Arg[4] = '10'
2 ETQ399 Arg[5] = 'Generate Program Loads'
1 ETQ399 Using error summary log 'RSGEN.ELG'.
1 ETQ399 Expanded phase arguments:
2 ETQ399 Arg[3] = 'RSGEN\.SM1'
1EETQ399 Last error code set is: No entry with key '18575400/RSGEN_GENER8_SHADOW'
1EETQ204 Upgrade phase "RUN_RSGEN" aborted with severe errors ("20151102133011")
In fact there was a problem with background job RSGEN_GENER8_SHADOW, but I have started it manually again and it finished correctly.
What I have already done:
1. Restarted SUM
2. Restarted shadow instance
3. Restarted main instance
4. I have tried to debug it but with no result.
Can You guys help me out somehow?
Hi Experts,
We have a new employee join our company. I see his Sid has been added into the AISUSER list but I am not able to find him on SU01 user list?
Isn't this process is automated? Once you have any user added into the AISUSER, the job which is connected to SAP should create the new user?
Any help would be appreciated.
Thanks,
Charly
I am looking to have a role with access only to System Recommendations under change management.
Idea is for the teams to look only the system recommendations.
I am not able to find the standard role.
Please share your expertise thoughts.
Hi Guys
When checking DB Utilization graphs in System Reporting, the bar graphs seems to be incorrect
DB is SQL Server 2012
Actual Data from DBACOCKPIT is:
Allocated database size is 239.429 MB
Total space utilized by SAPDATA 324.116 MB
Free Space: 84.687
Free Space in Filesystem 50GB
Below see data extracted from System Monitoring in Solution Manager
Occupied Memory seems pretty accurate.
Then it says 336GB free and 113 GB free Filesystem
And then the bar graphs, seems to sum all items = 243GB + 336 GB Free + 113 GB (Filesystem Free) for a grand total of 700 GB aprox when the total size of Filesystem is just 400GB
Is there a way to fix this inaccurate data?
Hi experts, we have a running solman SP12 configured for VAR scenario, we have been using it for incident management, however, we have not working the mail sending feature. We did the configuration using: "Application Incident Management –Configuration and Upgrade Guide for Service Provider / SAP Channel Partner (VAR) " but theres no anything about mail sending.
When we go to an incident and then More->Send E-Mail->Send , we get the message:"No e-mail adress in your user master record; E-mail will not be sent", however if i check in SU01 and BP transactions,my system users and business partners(related to this users) all have e-mail adress.
Another strange thing is that , in the mail screen, if i select more->from , i get an empty list
And also, when listing the contact persons for a ticket, the email is empty,however all su01 and business partners, have e-mail assigned:
Does anybody has some tips for configuring e-mail(and make e-mail adresses appear in the incident management screens)?
Thank you so much!
Hello Experts,
Can you please let me know if we can create static TBOM for Z transaction?
Thanks
Gaurav Patel
Hello Everyone,
We have one solution manager system and one ERP system installed in a single host. Now we have to do managed system configuration for ERP system. Now the question is do I have to install one Diagnostic agent on the same host or two diagnostic agent on the same host?
Also is it possible to use Agent on fly concept here.
could you please help.
Regards,
Rajith Kannan R S
Hello community,
unfortunately I am having trouble activating the Technical Monitoring for two databases.
Activation was successful for several other systems, it seems that the trouble is only for the databases.
Does anyone have an idea how to proceed?
I've attached two screenshots showing the error.
Thanks,
Alexander
Hello solman experts,
does some one of you already worked with BO tools in order to extent standard Interactive Reporting (BEX queries)?
Of great interest is the experience with Crystal Reports for extention of Interactive Reporting for e.g. daily/weekly reporting.
Thank you!